Dragonfly vs Redis: Modern In-Memory Store Comparison
Redis is single-threaded. Dragonfly is multi-threaded and claims 25x throughput. Is it ready for production? This guide compares both with benchmarks and deployment patterns.
TL;DR
- Dragonfly = multi-threaded Redis alternative
- 25x higher throughput claims
- Drop-in Redis replacement (RESP protocol)
- Better memory efficiency
- Production-ready since 2023
Feature Comparison
FEATURE DRAGONFLY REDIS
======= ========= =====
Threading Multi-threaded Single-threaded
Throughput 4M+ ops/sec 100K+ ops/sec
Memory efficiency Better Good
Clustering Built-in Redis Cluster
Persistence Yes (RDB/AOF) Yes (RDB/AOF)
Lua scripting Yes Yes
Modules Limited Extensive
Maturity 2023+ 2009+
Community Growing Massive
Enterprise support DragonflyDB Inc Redis Ltd
Benchmark Results
OPERATION DRAGONFLY REDIS 7 SPEEDUP
========= ========= ======= =======
SET 4.2M ops/sec 180K ops/sec 23x
GET 4.5M ops/sec 200K ops/sec 22x
INCR 3.8M ops/sec 170K ops/sec 22x
LPUSH 3.5M ops/sec 150K ops/sec 23x
HSET 3.2M ops/sec 140K ops/sec 23x
Test: 64 cores, 256GB RAM, 100 concurrent connections
Deploy Dragonfly on Kubernetes
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: dragonfly
spec:
serviceName: dragonfly
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: dragonfly
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: dragonfly
spec:
containers:
- name: dragonfly
image: docker.dragonflydb.io/dragonflydb/dragonfly:v1.14.0
args:
- --logtostderr
- --cache_mode # LRU eviction
- --maxmemory=8G
- --proactor_threads=8
ports:
- containerPort: 6379
name: redis
- containerPort: 9999
name: metrics
resources:
requests:
cpu: "4"
memory: 10Gi
limits:
memory: 12Gi
volumeMounts:
- name: data
mountPath: /data
livenessProbe:
exec:
command: ["redis-cli", "ping"]
initialDelaySeconds: 10
readinessProbe:
exec:
command: ["redis-cli", "ping"]
initialDelaySeconds: 5
volumeClaimTemplates:
- metadata:
name: data
spec:
accessModes: ["ReadWriteOnce"]
storageClassName: gp3
resources:
requests:
storage: 100Gi
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: dragonfly
spec:
ports:
- port: 6379
name: redis
- port: 9999
name: metrics
selector:
app: dragonfly
Helm Deployment
helm repo add dragonfly https://dragonflydb.github.io/helm-charts
helm upgrade --install dragonfly dragonfly/dragonfly \
--namespace cache --create-namespace \
--set resources.requests.cpu=4 \
--set resources.requests.memory=8Gi \
--set extraArgs="{--cache_mode,--maxmemory=6G}"
Deploy Redis (for comparison)
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: redis
spec:
serviceName: redis
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: redis
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: redis
spec:
containers:
- name: redis
image: redis:7-alpine
command:
- redis-server
- --maxmemory 6gb
- --maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru
- --appendonly yes
ports:
- containerPort: 6379
resources:
requests:
cpu: "2"
memory: 8Gi
volumeMounts:
- name: data
mountPath: /data
volumeClaimTemplates:
- metadata:
name: data
spec:
accessModes: ["ReadWriteOnce"]
resources:
requests:
storage: 50Gi
Application Connection
Both use the same Redis protocol:
import "github.com/redis/go-redis/v9"
func main() {
// Works with both Redis and Dragonfly
client := redis.NewClient(&redis.Options{
Addr: "dragonfly.cache:6379", // or redis.cache:6379
})
ctx := context.Background()
// Same commands work
client.Set(ctx, "key", "value", time.Hour)
val, _ := client.Get(ctx, "key").Result()
}
High Availability
Dragonfly HA (Master-Replica)
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: dragonfly
spec:
replicas: 3
template:
spec:
containers:
- name: dragonfly
image: docker.dragonflydb.io/dragonflydb/dragonfly:v1.14.0
args:
- --logtostderr
- --cluster_mode=emulated
- --cluster_announce_ip=$(POD_IP)
env:
- name: POD_IP
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
fieldPath: status.podIP
Redis Sentinel
# Use Bitnami Redis chart for HA
helm upgrade --install redis bitnami/redis \
--set sentinel.enabled=true \
--set sentinel.quorum=2 \
--set replica.replicaCount=2
When to Use Which
Use Dragonfly when:
- High throughput is critical (millions of ops/sec)
- You have multi-core machines to utilize
- You want simpler scaling (no cluster sharding)
- Memory efficiency is important
- Starting fresh (no Redis modules needed)
Use Redis when:
- You need Redis modules (RedisSearch, RedisJSON, etc.)
- You’re already running Redis in production
- You need the larger ecosystem and community
- Enterprise support is important
- Stability over raw performance
Migration Strategy
# 1. Deploy Dragonfly alongside Redis
# 2. Use Dragonfly for reads (shadow traffic)
# 3. Compare results
# 4. Switch writes to Dragonfly
# 5. Decommission Redis
# Shadow traffic example
if dragonfly_enabled:
result = dragonfly.get(key)
redis_result = redis.get(key) # Compare
if result != redis_result:
log.warning("Mismatch", key=key)
Monitoring
# Both expose Prometheus metrics
apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1
kind: ServiceMonitor
metadata:
name: dragonfly
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: dragonfly
endpoints:
- port: metrics
path: /metrics
Key metrics:
dragonfly_connected_clientsdragonfly_used_memory_bytesdragonfly_commands_processed_totaldragonfly_keyspace_hits_totaldragonfly_keyspace_misses_total
References
- Dragonfly: https://dragonflydb.io
- Dragonfly Docs: https://www.dragonflydb.io/docs
- Redis: https://redis.io
- Benchmark: https://www.dragonflydb.io/blog/dragonfly-1-0-benchmark